By Azeez Nazar Sabri
In a recent Judgment Supreme Court has held that the rate of
the interest for pre and post award period should be uniform. Court further held
that there can’t be a uniform rate of interest for INR and EUR components. Supreme
court passed this landmark judgment in the matter of Vedanta Ltd. Vs Shenzen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction
Co. Ltd ( SSNCPL). ( SLP (Civil) No. 25819 of 2018).
Facts:
On 22nd May, 2018, the Appellant ( Vendanta Ltd) and
respondent (SSNPCL)entered into four inter related contracts for construction
of 210 MW Co- Generation Power Plant.
Each of four contracts contained an arbitration clause. Certain disputed
arose between the parties, which resulted in the termination of the EPC
Contracts by SSNCPL and arbitration was invoked by the respondent (SSNPCL).
The arbitral Tribunal passed a detailed Award dated
09.11.2017, wherein the Tribunal awarded interest on the awarded sum @ 9% from
the date of institution of the arbitration proceedings provided the awarded
amount is paid/ deposited within 120 days of the award. Tribunal further awarded post award interest
@ 15% till dated of realization of awarded amount if amount is not paid within
120 days. Further tribunal awarded a uniform rate of interest on both the
components of Award i.e. the amounts payable in INR and EUR.
Aggrieved by the said Award Appellant (Vedanta) filed
objections under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act before
Delhi High Court. Objections were rejected by High Court vide its order dated
12.02.2008.
Against the said order of single judge, appellant filed an
appeal before a Division Bench of Delhi High Court under section 37 of the said
Act. The said appeal was also dismissed on 30.08.2018.
Aggrieved by the judgment of the Division Bench, the
Appellant filed SLP.
Judgment/observations
The dual rate of Interest awarded by Arbitral Tribunal seems
to be unjustified. The award of a much higher rate of Interest after 120 days
is arbitrary, since the Award debtor is entitled to challenge the award within
a maximum period of 120 days as provided by section 34( 3) of the 1996
Arbitration Act. If the award- debtor is made liable to pay a higher rate of
interest after 120 days, it would foreclose or seriously affect his statutory
right to challenge the Award by filing objections under section 34 of the said Act.
The imposition of a higher rate of interest @ 15% post 120
days is exorbitant, from an economic standpoint, and has no co- relation with
the prevailing contemporary international rates of interest. The Award- debtor
cannot be subject to a penal rates of Interest, either during the period when
he is entitled to exercise the statutory right to challenge the Award, before a
Court of law, or later. Furthermore, the arbitral tribunal has not given any
reason for imposing a 15% rate of interest post 120 days.
The award of interest @ 9% on the Euro component of the Claim
is unjustified and unwarranted. The levy of such a high rate of interest on a
claim made in a foreign currency would result in the Claimant being awarded
compensation, contrary to the conditions stipulated in the contract. A uniform rate
of interest for INR and EUR would therefore not be justified. The rate of 9%
interest on the INR component awarded by the Tribunal will remain undisturbed.
However, with respect to the EUR component, the award debtor will be liable to
pay interest at the LIBOR rate + 3 percentage points prevailing on the date of
the Award. Post award period Interest @ 15% stand deleted.
Email: azeez_nazar@rediffmail.com
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete